Let me tell you something. I'm closing public content for two days. On one hand, I'm on my period. On the other hand, you guys don't understand what I'm saying.

Where's your mockery of me coming from? You're bearish, I'm looking for pullbacks to go long. I emphasized this - right now I can't be described as bullish, only as "pullback long." Either you're mocking me for not letting you short while I'm going long, so you get to profit both ways while mocking me for single-directional trading.

1. Didn't I say that the third leg must be less than or equal to ≤ the lowest point of the first leg? Did I ask you to go long at the lowest point of the first leg?

2. In my reply to comments, weren't the long positions I mentioned aggressive at 69650 and conservative at 69050? I even emphasized that for subscription users, I told them to go long at 69050.

3. Didn't I say: at 69050 go long, with normal position sizing you don't need a stop loss, just set a longer stop in case of a waterfall drop.

If any of these three points don't match what you saw, stand up and let's argue it out. If we can't settle it that way, buy me a plane ticket and I'll fly over to debate you in person.

If you still don't understand, let me use the most reasonable chart analysis language from the trading world: before any level breaks last night, you can go long at it. Whether it's 70500/70000/69500/69000 - any level works. Once it breaks, you can't trade it anymore. It dropped to 68880, all those levels broke along the way, and you're still going long? Are you stupid? Every trading master says you can only go long if it doesn't break. If it already broke, how can you still go long? You see 69000 dropped to 68880 but it's a false break, you're going long - isn't that awesome, isn't that impressive?

That's it. Closing public content for two days. Stop profit levels for my long positions are above - but if you see them, take profits anytime. For subscription users, I'll shout when I exit. If I don't shout, just hold to target with limit orders.