
A BIP, or Bitcoin Improvement Proposal, is an open technical document and process designed to upgrade and improve the Bitcoin network. It clearly outlines what changes are being proposed, why they're necessary, how they should be implemented, and how they maintain compatibility with previous rules. This transparency makes it easier for the community to discuss and adopt improvements.
Because Bitcoin operates as a decentralized system with no single company making upgrade decisions, BIPs empower anyone to propose changes. Through public documentation and collaboration, BIPs introduce upgrades to the mainnet with minimal risk. Many features you experience—such as lower transaction fees or more secure wallet backups—are made possible by specific BIPs.
The process for proposing and accepting a BIP is transparent and structured, focusing first on clearly defining motivations and specifications before moving to community review and testing.
BIPs are proposals that define changes or standards, while the Bitcoin protocol and its software implement these changes through activation. Not every BIP modifies consensus rules; many focus on wallet standards, address formats, or related features.
Consensus-altering BIPs affect transaction validation logic, such as input script restrictions or signature algorithm upgrades. These changes are usually implemented as soft forks to ensure older nodes can continue operating securely. Non-consensus BIPs enhance user experience, such as introducing more readable address formats or more reliable wallet backup methods.
Common BIPs fall into several categories, addressing wallet generation, transaction structure, and address formatting:
BIPs directly impact your experience when creating wallets, backing up keys, entering addresses, or managing transaction fees. They play a crucial role in security and compatibility.
With self-custody wallets, your BIP-39 mnemonic phrase acts as your master key—losing or exposing it puts your funds at risk. Thanks to BIP-32/44, a single seed can generate multiple addresses; moving to a new device allows you to recover all your accounts.
On the transaction side, BIP-141 (SegWit) reduces transaction size for generally lower fees. BIP-173’s Bech32 addresses start with “bc1,” making them easier to recognize and reducing the risk of entry errors.
When withdrawing Bitcoin from Gate, you’ll see prompts for supported address types—such as “bc1” from BIP-173. Deposit pages also highlight compatible address prefixes to prevent failed transactions due to mismatched address types.
Risk reminder: Mnemonic phrases must be securely stored offline—never take screenshots or upload them to the cloud. Always confirm that your address type matches your network selection before transferring funds to avoid losses from incompatibility.
When reviewing a BIP, start by understanding its structure before diving into technical details or compatibility concerns.
Reading these sections helps you determine if a particular BIP is relevant to you and how it might impact your usage.
Both BIPs and EIPs (Ethereum Improvement Proposals) are formal upgrade processes for their respective blockchains but operate under different ecosystems and governance models. Bitcoin prioritizes cautious evolution and long-term stability; Ethereum’s EIPs evolve more rapidly with frequent smart contract layer changes.
BIPs are fewer in number and more conservative—many are implemented via soft forks prioritizing backward compatibility. EIPs span broader topics including the virtual machine and transaction fee models, with faster upgrade cycles driven by tight coordination between developer communities and core teams. Neither approach is inherently superior; each serves the unique needs and culture of its ecosystem.
The caution behind BIPs stems from Bitcoin’s monetary value and its global user base. Any consensus-layer change can impact transaction validation or node behavior, making security and compatibility top priorities.
Soft forks are commonly used because they introduce stricter rules without forcing all nodes to upgrade immediately—new nodes enforce stricter logic while older nodes continue processing blocks safely.
To minimize risks, upgrades go through lengthy testing periods and phased activations with adequate monitoring windows. For example, Taproot was activated in November 2021 only after extensive testing. As of October 2024, discussions about privacy- and efficiency-focused proposals are ongoing; however, all major changes undergo comprehensive peer review and real-world testing before mainnet deployment.
BIPs are Bitcoin’s open improvement mechanism—turning proposed changes into reviewable standards that can be implemented by the community. These include both consensus-impacting upgrades and improvements in wallets or address formats. Through careful review processes and strategies like soft forks, the ecosystem balances security with compatibility. For users, understanding key BIPs such as mnemonic phrases (BIP‑39), address formats (BIP‑173), SegWit (BIP‑141), and Taproot (BIP‑340/341/342) helps with secure backups, choosing address types, evaluating fees, and managing privacy risks. When using exchanges or wallets, pay close attention to address/network prompts to avoid fund losses from incompatibility.
BIP stands for Bitcoin Improvement Proposal—a formal document used by the Bitcoin community to propose and discuss protocol upgrades. It records detailed designs for new features, standards, or processes—similar to a “design document” in software development. All major Bitcoin upgrades must go through the BIP process for community review and approval.
Most BIPs are transparent to end-users since wallets automatically adapt behind the scenes. However, BIPs that impact consensus rules (such as Segregated Witness / SegWit) can affect transaction formats or fee calculations. It’s advisable to monitor major upgrade announcements and update your wallet promptly to stay compatible with the network.
A BIP is Bitcoin’s improvement proposal standard; an EIP (Ethereum Improvement Proposal) serves this role for Ethereum. While their processes and governance models are similar, they apply to different blockchains. Bitcoin’s BIP updates are typically more cautious; Ethereum’s EIPs change more frequently.
Each BIP is assigned a unique number for identification and tracking. For example, BIP34 specifies how block height should be encoded; BIP91 relates to SegWit activation support. These numbers help the community quickly reference specific proposals without repeating full titles during discussions.
Regular users don’t need deep technical knowledge of every BIP—just a basic understanding of major upgrades is sufficient. If you’re involved in mining, development, or governance activities, then deeper knowledge is necessary. Gate provides educational resources and community announcements so users can quickly grasp key upgrade points.


