AI Native Public Chain Battle: Six Major Projects Including Sentient Compete for the On-Chain DeAI Market

AI Layer1 Arena: Finding the On-Chain DeAI Fertile Ground

In recent years, leading tech companies such as OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, and Meta have been driving the rapid development of large language models (LLM). LLMs have demonstrated unprecedented capabilities across various industries, greatly expanding the realm of human imagination and even showing potential to replace human labor in certain scenarios. However, the core of these technologies is firmly held in the hands of a few centralized tech giants. With substantial capital and control over expensive computing resources, these companies have built formidable barriers that make it difficult for the vast majority of developers and innovation teams to compete.

At the same time, in the early stages of rapid AI evolution, public opinion often focuses on the breakthroughs and conveniences brought by technology, while relatively insufficient attention is paid to core issues such as privacy protection, transparency, and security. In the long run, these issues will profoundly affect the healthy development of the AI industry and societal acceptance. If not properly addressed, the debate over whether AI is "good" or "evil" will become increasingly prominent, and centralized giants, driven by profit-seeking instincts, often lack sufficient motivation to proactively tackle these challenges.

Blockchain technology, with its decentralized, transparent, and censorship-resistant characteristics, offers new possibilities for the sustainable development of the AI industry. Currently, numerous "Web3 AI" applications have emerged on some mainstream blockchains. However, a deeper analysis reveals that these projects still face many issues: on one hand, the degree of decentralization is limited, as key components and infrastructure still rely on centralized cloud services, making it difficult to support a truly open ecosystem; on the other hand, compared to AI products in the Web2 world, on-chain AI remains limited in terms of model capabilities, data utilization, and application scenarios, with room for improvement in innovation depth and breadth.

To truly realize the vision of decentralized AI, enabling the blockchain to securely, efficiently, and democratically support large-scale AI applications while competing with centralized solutions in performance, we need to design a Layer 1 blockchain specifically tailored for AI. This will provide a solid foundation for open innovation, democratic governance, and data security in AI, promoting the prosperous development of a decentralized AI ecosystem.

Biteye and PANews Jointly Release AI Layer1 Research Report: Seeking the On-chain DeAI Fertile Ground

Core Features of AI Layer 1

AI Layer 1, as a blockchain specifically tailored for AI applications, is designed with its underlying architecture and performance closely aligned with the needs of AI tasks, aiming to efficiently support the sustainable development and prosperity of the on-chain AI ecosystem. Specifically, AI Layer 1 should possess the following core capabilities:

  1. Efficient incentives and decentralized consensus mechanism The core of AI Layer 1 lies in building an open network for sharing resources such as computing power and storage. Unlike traditional blockchain nodes that primarily focus on ledger bookkeeping, the nodes of AI Layer 1 are required to undertake more complex tasks. They not only need to provide computing power and complete AI model training and inference, but also contribute diverse resources such as storage, data, and bandwidth, thereby breaking the monopoly of centralized giants in AI infrastructure. This raises higher demands for the underlying consensus and incentive mechanisms: AI Layer 1 must be able to accurately assess, incentivize, and verify the actual contributions of nodes in tasks such as AI inference and training, achieving network security and efficient resource allocation. Only in this way can the stability and prosperity of the network be guaranteed, while effectively reducing the overall computing power costs.

  2. Excellent high performance and heterogeneous task support capabilities AI tasks, especially the training and inference of LLMs, place extremely high demands on computing performance and parallel processing capabilities. Furthermore, the on-chain AI ecosystem often needs to support diverse and heterogeneous task types, including various model structures, data processing, inference, storage, and other multi-faceted scenarios. AI Layer 1 must undergo deep optimization at the underlying architecture to meet requirements for high throughput, low latency, and elastic parallelism, and should preset native support capabilities for heterogeneous computing resources, ensuring that various AI tasks can operate efficiently and achieve smooth scaling from "single-type tasks" to "complex and diverse ecosystems."

  3. Verifiability and Trustworthy Output Guarantee AI Layer 1 not only needs to prevent security risks such as model malfeasance and data tampering but also must ensure the verifiability and alignment of AI output results from a fundamental mechanism perspective. By integrating cutting-edge technologies such as Trusted Execution Environments (TEE), Zero-Knowledge Proofs (ZK), and Multi-Party Computation (MPC), the platform enables every model inference, training, and data processing process to be independently verified, ensuring the fairness and transparency of the AI system. At the same time, this verifiability can help users clarify the logic and basis of AI outputs, achieving "what is obtained is what is desired", thereby enhancing user trust and satisfaction with AI products.

  4. Data Privacy Protection AI applications often involve sensitive user data, and data privacy protection is particularly critical in fields such as finance, healthcare, and social networking. AI Layer 1 should adopt encryption-based data processing technologies, privacy computing protocols, and data permission management methods while ensuring verifiability, to guarantee the security of data throughout the entire process of inference, training, and storage, effectively preventing data leakage and misuse, and alleviating users' concerns regarding data security.

  5. Powerful ecological support and development capabilities As an AI-native Layer 1 infrastructure, the platform not only needs to possess technological leadership but also must provide comprehensive development tools, integrated SDKs, operational support, and incentive mechanisms for ecosystem participants such as developers, node operators, and AI service providers. By continuously optimizing platform usability and developer experience, it promotes the implementation of diverse AI-native applications, achieving sustained prosperity of a decentralized AI ecosystem.

Based on the above background and expectations, this article will provide a detailed introduction to six representative AI Layer 1 projects, including Sentient, Sahara AI, Ritual, Gensyn, Bittensor, and 0G, systematically sorting out the latest developments in the field, analyzing the current state of project development, and discussing future trends.

Biteye and PANews jointly released AI Layer1 research report: Searching for fertile ground for on-chain DeAI

Sentient: Building Loyal Open Source Decentralized AI Models

Project Overview

Sentient is an open-source protocol platform that is building an AI Layer1 blockchain (, initially as Layer 2, and will later migrate to Layer 1). By combining AI Pipeline and blockchain technology, it aims to construct a decentralized artificial intelligence economy. Its core goal is to address the issues of model ownership, invocation tracking, and value distribution in the centralized LLM market through the "OML" framework (Open, Monetizable, Loyal), enabling AI models to achieve on-chain ownership structure, invocation transparency, and value sharing. Sentient's vision is to allow anyone to build, collaborate, own, and monetize AI products, thereby promoting a fair and open AI Agent network ecosystem.

The Sentient Foundation team brings together top academic experts, blockchain entrepreneurs, and engineers from around the world, dedicated to building a community-driven, open-source, and verifiable AGI platform. Core members include Princeton University professor Pramod Viswanath and Indian Institute of Science professor Himanshu Tyagi, who are responsible for AI safety and privacy protection, while Polygon co-founder Sandeep Nailwal leads the blockchain strategy and ecosystem layout. Team members come from well-known companies such as Meta, Coinbase, and Polygon, as well as top universities like Princeton University and the Indian Institutes of Technology, covering fields such as AI/ML, NLP, and computer vision, working together to promote project implementation.

As a second venture of Sandeep Nailwal, co-founder of Polygon, Sentient was born with a halo, possessing abundant resources, networks, and market awareness, providing strong backing for the project's development. In mid-2024, Sentient completed a $85 million seed round financing, led by Founders Fund, Pantera, and Framework Ventures, with dozens of well-known VCs including Delphi, Hashkey, and Spartan as other participating investors.

Biteye and PANews jointly released AI Layer1 research report: Seeking fertile ground for on-chain DeAI

design architecture and application layer

Infrastructure Layer

Core Architecture

The core architecture of Sentient consists of two parts: AI Pipeline and on-chain system:

The AI pipeline is the foundation for developing and training "Loyal AI" artifacts, consisting of two core processes:

  • Data Curation: A community-driven data selection process for model alignment.
  • Loyalty Training: Ensure that the model maintains a training process consistent with the community's intentions.

The blockchain system provides transparency and decentralized control for protocols, ensuring ownership of AI artifacts, usage tracking, revenue distribution, and fair governance. The specific architecture is divided into four layers:

  • Storage layer: stores model weights and fingerprint registration information;
  • Distribution Layer: The entry point for calling the model controlled by the authorization contract;
  • Access Layer: Verifies whether the user is authorized through permission proof;
  • Incentive Layer: The yield routing contract allocates payments to trainers, deployers, and validators on each call.

Biteye and PANews Jointly Release AI Layer1 Research Report: Finding the On-Chain DeAI Fertile Ground

OML Model Framework

The OML framework (Open, Monetizable, Loyal) is a core concept proposed by Sentient, aimed at providing clear ownership protection and economic incentive mechanisms for open-source AI models. By combining on-chain technology and AI native cryptography, it has the following characteristics:

  • Openness: The model must be open source, with transparent code and data structures, facilitating community reproduction, auditing, and improvement.
  • Monetization: Each model invocation triggers a revenue stream, and the on-chain contract will distribute the earnings to the trainers, deployers, and validators.
  • Loyalty: The model belongs to the contributor community, and the direction of upgrades and governance is determined by the DAO, with usage and modifications controlled by cryptographic mechanisms.
AI-native Cryptography

AI-native encryption utilizes the continuity, low-dimensional manifold structure, and differentiable characteristics of AI models to develop a "verifiable but non-removable" lightweight security mechanism. Its core technology is:

  • Fingerprint embedding: Insert a set of covert query-response key-value pairs during training to form a unique signature for the model;
  • Ownership Verification Protocol: Verify whether the fingerprint is retained through a third-party detector (Prover) in the form of a query.
  • Permission calling mechanism: Before calling, a "permission credential" issued by the model owner must be obtained, and the system will then authorize the model to decode the input and return the accurate answer.

This method enables "behavior-based authorization calls + ownership verification" without the cost of re-encryption.

Model Rights Confirmation and Security Execution Framework

Sentient currently adopts Melange mixed security: combining fingerprint verification, TEE execution, and on-chain contract revenue sharing. The fingerprint method is implemented by OML 1.0, emphasizing the "Optimistic Security" concept, which assumes compliance by default and allows for detection and punishment in case of violations.

The fingerprint mechanism is a key implementation of OML, which generates a unique signature for the model during the training phase by embedding specific "question-answer" pairs. Through these signatures, the model owner can verify ownership, preventing unauthorized copying and commercialization. This mechanism not only protects the rights of model developers but also provides a traceable on-chain record of the model's usage behavior.

In addition, Sentient has launched the Enclave TEE computing framework, which leverages trusted execution environments (such as AWS Nitro Enclaves) to ensure that the model only responds to authorized requests, preventing unauthorized access and use. Although TEE relies on hardware and has certain security risks, its high performance and real-time advantages make it a core technology for current model deployment.

In the future, Sentient plans to introduce Zero-Knowledge Proofs (ZK) and Fully Homomorphic Encryption (FHE) technologies to further enhance privacy protection and verifiability, providing support for the decentralized deployment of AI models.

DEAI-11.79%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 8
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
FundingMartyrvip
· 14h ago
Is this a copy of house of AI?
View OriginalReply0
ForkTonguevip
· 08-13 14:45
The giants roll back, but retail investors are still losing.
View OriginalReply0
ser_we_are_ngmivip
· 08-13 14:43
Haha, I've been playing with web3 for a year and still haven't made it, ngmi.
View OriginalReply0
just_another_fishvip
· 08-13 14:42
To get these AI toys to work well, we still have to look at the pros' faces.
View OriginalReply0
fomo_fightervip
· 08-13 14:42
The developer is dead.
View OriginalReply0
SchrödingersNodevip
· 08-13 14:41
Here to seek attention again.
View OriginalReply0
FarmHoppervip
· 08-13 14:28
Computing Power still relies on big companies, small teams can't handle it.
View OriginalReply0
ForkMongervip
· 08-13 14:17
just another centralization honeypot... protocol darwinism will eat them alive
Reply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate app
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)