💥 Gate 廣場活動:#发帖赢代币CGN 💥
在 Gate 廣場發布與 CGN、Launchpool 或 CandyDrop 相關的原創內容,即有機會瓜分 1,333 枚 CGN 獎勵!
📅 活動時間:2025年10月24日 18:00 – 11月4日 24:00(UTC+8)
📌 相關詳情:
Launchpool 👉 https://www.gate.com/zh/announcements/article/47771
CandyDrop 👉 https://www.gate.com/zh/announcements/article/47763
📌 參與方式:
1️⃣ 在 Gate 廣場發布原創內容,主題需與 CGN 或相關活動(Launchpool / CandyDrop)相關;
2️⃣ 內容不少於 80 字;
3️⃣ 帖子添加話題:#發帖贏代幣CGN
4️⃣ 附上任意活動參與截圖
🏆 獎勵設置(總獎池:1,333 CGN)
🥇 一等獎(1名):333 CGN
🥈 二等獎(2名):200 CGN / 人
🥉 三等獎(6名):100 CGN / 人
📄 注意事項:
內容必須原創,禁止抄襲;
獲獎者需完成 Gate 廣場身分認證;
活動最終解釋權歸 Gate 所有。
Mt. Gox’s security flaws costed millions. Could AI have spotted them?
Former Mt. Gox CEO Mark Karpelès probably wishes he had access to today’s artificial intelligence when he bought Mt. Gox from its founder, Jed McCaleb, in 2011
That’s because Karpelès has just fed an early version of Mt. Gox’s codebase into Anthropic’s Claude AI. What he got back was an analysis that broke down the key vulnerabilities that led to the defunct exchange’s first major hack, while labelling it “critically insecure.”
In a Sunday X post, Karpelès said he uploaded Mt. Gox’s 2011 codebase to Claude, alongside various data, including GitHub history, access logs and data “dumps released by” the hacker
“The developer (Jed McCaleb) demonstrated strong software engineering capabilities in terms of architecture and feature implementation, creating a sophisticated trading platform in just 3 months,” the analysis reads, adding, however, that:
Karpelès took over the reins of the Japan-based Mt. Gox in March 2011 after buying the exchange from founder and developer Jed McCaleb. The exchange then suffered a hack around three months later that saw 2,000 Bitcoin (BTC) drained from the platform
“I didn’t get to look at the code before taking over; it was dumped on me as soon as the contract was signed (I know better now, due diligence goes a long way),” added in a comment on his X post
Claude AI’s post-mortem of Mt. Gox
According to Claude AI, the key vulnerabilities consisted of a mixture of code flaws, a lack of internal documentation, weak admin and user passwords and retained account access of prior admins after new ownership handover.
The hack was sparked by a major data breach after Karpelès’ WordPress blog account and some of his social media accounts were compromised
“Contributing factors included: the insecure original platform, undocumented WordPress installation, retained admin access for ‘audits’ after ownership transfer, and a weak password for a critical admin account,” the analysis reads
The analysis also outlined that some changes pre- and post-hack “mitigated some attack vectors,” preventing the attack from being a lot worse than it could have been
Such changes included an update to a salted hashing algorithm to provide greater password protection, fixing an SQL injection hacking code in the main application, and implementing “proper locking around withdrawals.”
“The salted hashing prevented mass compromise and forced individual brute forcing, but no hashing algorithm can protect weak passwords. The withdrawal locking prevented the more severe outcome of tens of thousands of BTC being drained via the $0.01 withdrawal limit exploit,” the analysis reads, adding:
Related: The ghost of Mt. Gox will stop haunting Bitcoin this Halloween
While the analysis suggests AI could have helped shore up specific coding flaws, the core of the breach was the result of poor internal processes, weak passwords, and a critical lack of network segmentation that let a blog breach threaten the entire exchange
Unfortunately, AI cannot prevent human error
Mt. Gox still impacts the market a decade later
Despite being defunct for over a decade, Mt. Gox has continued to have an impact on the market over the past couple of years, as large sums of Bitcoin (BTC) have been repaid to creditors, resulting in significant potential selling pressure on the market, though this hasn’t happened as many have feared
Ahead of the Oct. 31 repayment deadline later this month, the exchange holds around 34,689 BTC
Magazine: Mysterious Mr Nakamoto author: Finding Satoshi would hurt Bitcoin