
The RFP is issued by the requesting unit, inviting multiple suppliers to submit detailed solutions for the project goals. Unlike the RFQ, which only focuses on pricing, the RFP places greater emphasis on strategic planning and execution capabilities. This mechanism ensures transparent competition, helping organizations select the most suitable collaborators from numerous proposals, thereby enhancing the project’s success rate.
Traditional financial institutions often use RFPs to recruit fund managers, providing investment strategies and risk proposals; they solicit IT vendor proposals during system upgrades; and they select professional service providers through compliance audits. This public process reduces decision-making risks and ensures the security of funds and data, becoming a standard procedure for large projects.
The demand side should detail the project background, functional requirements, evaluation criteria such as the weight of price and technical experience requirements, as well as the submission timeline and format. A clear and structured document can attract high-quality proposals, avoid ambiguity, and improve the efficiency of review and project matching.
Suppliers need to accurately address pain points, provide case data to demonstrate their strength, and propose innovative added value. Professionally formatted and logically structured documents are more likely to stand out and win contract opportunities.
Common challenges include the time-consuming RFP process, information asymmetry, and the cost burden on small teams. It is recommended to conduct an RFI to gather opinions in advance, simplify specifications, and digitize reviews to balance efficiency and fairness.











