ALPHA Airdrop Beginner's Guide: Multiple Small Baskets Strategy vs. Risks of a Single Large Basket

In the process of participating in the ALPHA airdrop and new token launches, how to reasonably allocate funds has become the biggest test of strategy. Many participants face the same question: should they concentrate their funds on a few projects or diversify across multiple tokens? Recent market performance has already provided the answer—diversified multi-asset portfolios are becoming a wiser choice.

Recent Market Fluctuations, Participation Choices for XPIN and SPACE

According to the latest market data, XPIN recently experienced a dip, with the price approaching $0.00, and a 24-hour increase of +1.39%. After a short-term rapid decline, it has gradually stabilized. Meanwhile, the SPACE project previously surged to around 160, but the lessons from this rise are worth noting—many committed participants had overly high expectations for new tokens.

For those already in the profit-taking cycle, continuing to hold positions offers limited value. SPACE’s recent performance reminds us not to have overly high expectations for every new token. In fact, if you calculate your profit-taking system and consumption costs, you’ll see that relying on a single large basket strategy carries significant risk—because new token markets are not always upward trending.

ZAMA Project TGE New Token Launch Opportunity Analysis

This week, there are expected to be new TGE (Token Generation Event) opportunities, with the ZAMA project being particularly noteworthy. Based on project evaluations, ZAMA’s score is not expected to be too low, meaning that if you have enough points, participating in this round of new token launches is worthwhile. But the key is to recognize the situation: not all new tokens listed will generate profits; risk diversification remains the key.

This is also why the multi-basket allocation method is gradually becoming a community consensus. Instead of putting all funds into a single project, it’s better to diversify across multiple possibilities. Even if one project performs poorly, others may help offset the losses.

OWL Scoring Strategy: Small Amounts in Multiple Tokens Outperform Large Amounts in a Single Token

Take OWL as an example, which is currently a key token for scoring. According to the latest data, OWL is priced at $0.01, with a 24-hour decline of -43.76%. In such an environment, scoring strategies are especially important. It is recommended to use small amounts across multiple tokens rather than concentrating large sums into a single token, which can effectively control risk.

Specifically, after enabling reverse trading, earning 15 points might require about 3 USDT in costs. Based on this standard, a full cycle could require a total expenditure of around 50 USDT, and earning two 30-point rewards would yield at most 10 USDT in profit. If the rate of profit consumption is slow, it’s basically at the break-even point.

This data reflects an important phenomenon: the current scoring environment has indeed become more challenging. Many participants have recently experienced stop-losses, and industry insiders are frequently adjusting strategies. The main reason is that the traditional large single-asset investment model is no longer efficient. Those who previously made big gains are still holding on, mainly because in this game, as long as you stay at the table, there’s always a chance to turn things around.

Using a multi-basket strategy is the best practice to adapt to the current environment. Instead of expecting a single token to explode, it’s better to manage risks well and steadily advance across multiple opportunities.