Trade
Basic
Futures
Futures
Hundreds of contracts settled in USDT or BTC
TradFi
Gold
Trade global traditional assets with USDT in one place
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Futures Kickoff
Get prepared for your futures trading
Futures Events
Participate in events to win generous rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to experience risk-free trading
Earn
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Launchpad
Be early to the next big token project
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and enjoy airdrop rewards!
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
Investment
Simple Earn
Earn interests with idle tokens
Auto-Invest
Auto-invest on a regular basis
Dual Investment
Buy low and sell high to take profits from price fluctuations
Soft Staking
Earn rewards with flexible staking
Crypto Loan
0 Fees
Pledge one crypto to borrow another
Lending Center
One-stop lending hub
VIP Wealth Hub
Customized wealth management empowers your assets growth
Private Wealth Management
Customized asset management to grow your digital assets
Quant Fund
Top asset management team helps you profit without hassle
Staking
Stake cryptos to earn in PoS products
Smart Leverage
New
No forced liquidation before maturity, worry-free leveraged gains
GUSD Minting
Use USDT/USDC to mint GUSD for treasury-level yields
More
Trending Topics
View More144.94K Popularity
100.93K Popularity
31.29K Popularity
52.96K Popularity
398.81K Popularity
Pin
BIP-110 sparks controversy in the Bitcoin community, with several OGs like Wang Chun and Jameson Lopp explicitly opposing it.
Odaily Planet Daily reports that the BIP-110 proposal has recently sparked significant controversy within the Bitcoin community, with several Bitcoin OGs including Fish Pool co-founder Wang Chun, Casa co-founder Jameson Lopp, and Blockstream CEO Adam Back explicitly voicing their opposition.
Wang Chun stated that BIP-110 is like “a bunch of nonsense packaged in the name of protecting children, then imposed on us as a whole.”
Jameson Lopp also published a lengthy article criticizing BIP-110 as reckless, irrational, and doomed to fail.
Adam Back believes that BIP-110 could threaten Bitcoin’s immutability and store of value.
Odaily Note: BIP-110 is a recent proposed improvement in the Bitcoin community, aiming to limit the size of non-monetary data (such as Ordinals inscriptions) in transactions through a soft fork, to alleviate the issue of “junk data” occupying block space.