Accused of Being Satoshi Nakamoto, Cryptographer Adam Back Denies the Claim


Renowned cryptographer and CEO of Blockstream, Adam Back, firmly denies the investigation report by The New York Times (NYT) that suggests he is behind Satoshi Nakamoto. In the report released on Wednesday (08/04), NYT claims to have strong evidence from stylistic analysis (stylometry) and technical records linking Back’s Hashcash invention to the core architecture of Bitcoin.
Through his personal X account on Thursday (09/04), Adam Back explained that the similarities are merely coincidental due to his active participation in digital privacy and e-cash research since 1992. He emphasized that he is not Satoshi and does not know the true identity of Bitcoin’s creator. According to Back, the NYT’s claim is just confirmation bias from the numerous comments he made in Cypherpunk forums in the past.
In response to this controversy, Michael Saylor also defended Back, stating that past email correspondence evidence shows that Back and Satoshi are two different entities. Saylor emphasized that without valid proof such as the use of Satoshi’s private keys, all these identity theories are just narratives without credible evidence. For the crypto community, Satoshi’s anonymity remains a key pillar in maintaining Bitcoin’s neutrality as a global asset. #USIranCeasefireTalksFaceSetbacks #CreatorLeaderboard $BTC
BTC0,79%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • Comment
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
Add a comment
Add a comment
No comments
  • Pin