Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
TradFi
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Pre-IPOs
Unlock full access to global stock IPOs
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
These days I've been seeing a bunch of airdrop tasks, and the anti-witchcraft efforts are starting to feel more like clocking in for work... I'm a bit tired too, but I still casually check what cross-chain is really trusting. To put it simply, a message transfer from "A to B" isn't just trusting the front end of the bridge; you have to break it down all the way: Will chain A rollback itself, who is submitting the proof/signature, is the verification logic solid, will relayers relay your message correctly, and finally, how does the B chain contract handle this message (are there replay attacks, order issues, timeout risks, and other small pitfalls). IBC feels like it clarifies the "trust boundary" a bit more, but when you really use it, you still have to ask yourself: am I trusting the security of the chain itself, or am I trusting a group of people/multisig/unchanged code that hasn't had issues? That's all for now, take it slow, don't let points push you too fast.