Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
TradFi
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Pre-IPOs
Unlock full access to global stock IPOs
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
These days, I keep seeing discussions about royalties in the secondary market, feeling like someone has unscrewed the creator's thermos so everyone can smell it: some say "voluntary is fine," others say "if you don't charge, it will cool off."
What I actually care more about is the emotional turning point during that liquidity shock—when everyone gets nervous, they first cut costs, and royalties become the first baggage to be thrown off the train.
The group is still talking about stablecoin regulation, reserve audits, and de-pegging rumors... that atmosphere is very similar: uncertainty from the start, everyone wants everything to be "verifiable and exit-able."
Honestly, the royalty dispute isn't a moral issue; it's a trust structure issue: who on the platform, buyer, or creator makes promises, and what kind of promises are they?
Anyway, I’m not really listening to slogans when I look at projects now; I first want to see if they clearly explain their plan to "survive without royalties."
If they haven't explained it clearly, no matter how good it looks, I’ll just keep it as a vase.