Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
TradFi
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Launchpad
Be early to the next big token project
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
More
A messy blame game is unfolding around TUSD's reserve management.
Justin Sun just dropped accusations that First Digital Trust secretly moved TUSD's liquidity reserves to some unauthorized third party. Sounds serious, right? But here's where it gets interesting—FDT fired back immediately, claiming they're not at fault. Their defense? They were simply following orders from Techteryx, and guess who sits as an advisor there? The same person making the accusations.
So who's really responsible when reserves get shuffled around? The custodian executing instructions, or the advisory chain giving those instructions? This finger-pointing drama raises uncomfortable questions about accountability in stablecoin reserve management. When multiple parties handle your liquidity, who actually answers when things go sideways?
The crypto space watches closely as these institutional players toss responsibility back and forth. At stake isn't just TUSD's reputation—it's trust in the entire framework of how stablecoin reserves should be managed and monitored.
That's why I never touch stablecoins... no one takes responsibility for the longer endorsements.
Sun and FDT are blaming each other, and in the end, it's the retail investors' money that gets hurt.
---
To put it simply, the longer management is just digging a pit, and when something goes wrong, they can all hide...
---
Now it's good, the longer the responsibility chain, the fewer people are accountable, and that's how stablecoins get ruined.
---
I just want to know what TUSD users are thinking right now...
---
The classic "I was just following orders", I'm so tired of this phrase.
---
A few pros blame each other, and in the end, the suckers pay the bill, this script is too familiar.
---
The management of reserves really needs to be transparent, who would dare to touch stablecoins like this...
This chain is as long as a Russian nesting doll; when something goes wrong, everyone can shift the blame.
Justin Sun's move is quite interesting, blaming others while being involved himself...
With stablecoins being handled like this, who would dare hold onto them?