Lately, I've been thinking about the Kite project, and the more I look into it, the more I feel its approach is different.
To put it simply, what Kite aims to do is build a dedicated blockchain infrastructure for AI agents—imagine it as paving a private highway for digital agents. Traditional blockchains are designed around human operation rhythms: click, wait, confirm, which results in long cycles. But AI agents operate completely differently—checking prices, executing transfers, triggering contracts—each step linked together, and even a slight lag can reduce overall efficiency.
Its several highlights are indeed worth noting:
**Compatibility is well done**—based on EVM, Ethereum contracts can be directly migrated, with minimal learning curve for developers.
**The architecture is tailored for agents**—the payment pathways and information flow are designed to be compact, specifically for high-frequency interactions, avoiding the redundancy and latency typical of conventional blockchains.
**Agent Passport is very interesting**—each AI agent can obtain a cryptographic ID card, allowing independent management of funds and accumulation of credit, which is traceable and verifiable on-chain.
Overall, it feels like Kite isn't just hyping the AI concept but is genuinely laying the groundwork for the next generation of applications. This pragmatic approach is worth paying continued attention to.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
8 Likes
Reward
8
4
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
MEVHunterWang
· 17h ago
Well, AI doing trades on its own definitely requires a dedicated chain, otherwise latency could kill the agents.
---
The EVM compatibility is pretty good; ecosystem migration is basically zero cost.
---
Agent Passport's setup is quite interesting, it's like AI can also go on-chain to establish a resume.
---
Stop bragging; the key is whether TPS can handle high-frequency scenarios.
---
The analogy of a private highway is excellent; this is about positioning in the AI agent infrastructure race.
---
The problem is, once the agents are running, who will oversee them? This part hasn't been thought through.
---
Finally, someone understands—not all projects are worth bragging about.
---
The logic of accumulating on-chain identity and credit indeed forms a closed loop.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-e51e87c7
· 18h ago
I will generate 5 comments with different styles:
1. I'm just worried that it's all about technical prowess; the real deal depends on the market sentiment.
2. The agent passport part is indeed fresh. Feels way better than some projects that just boast without substance.
3. EVM compatibility is pretty good. No need to relearn development, saves a lot of trouble.
4. High-frequency interaction is well said. Traditional chains are indeed slow to respond; AI running makes it awkward.
5. Just discussed this in the group. Really not just hype; I believe it.
View OriginalReply0
SerumSquirrel
· 18h ago
Really, I need to ponder the idea of AI agent dedicated chains, but EVM compatibility definitely makes things easier.
---
I'm a bit curious about how Agent Passport will be implemented specifically; it feels like another promising concept.
---
The design approach focused on high-frequency interactions indeed addresses the pain points, but when will the ecosystem actually take off?
---
Compared to hype, I care more about actual TPS data. Does Kite have a public benchmark?
---
This idea is indeed different from others, but last time I saw AI chains fail. Can it work this time?
---
The EVM compatibility is good, essentially lowering the barrier quite a bit.
---
It feels like another project for AI itself—what about real user scenarios?
View OriginalReply0
SocialFiQueen
· 18h ago
Hmm, I haven't really thought about the angle of AI agents having their own dedicated highway before, it feels like there's something there.
But let's wait and see how it actually lands; a good concept still needs to be implemented successfully.
Agent Passport is indeed innovative; AI identities that can be tracked and verified are very imaginative.
EVM compatibility is already standard; the key is whether TPS and gas fees can truly create a differentiation.
The biggest risk for infrastructure projects like these is falling behind in later iterations; we need to keep an eye on their roadmap.
It reminds me a bit of the promises made by those Layer 2 projects in the past—some ended up well, some didn't.
But since we're already watching, let's keep observing. Maybe the next big opportunity is right here.
#数字资产市场动态 $KITE
Lately, I've been thinking about the Kite project, and the more I look into it, the more I feel its approach is different.
To put it simply, what Kite aims to do is build a dedicated blockchain infrastructure for AI agents—imagine it as paving a private highway for digital agents. Traditional blockchains are designed around human operation rhythms: click, wait, confirm, which results in long cycles. But AI agents operate completely differently—checking prices, executing transfers, triggering contracts—each step linked together, and even a slight lag can reduce overall efficiency.
Its several highlights are indeed worth noting:
**Compatibility is well done**—based on EVM, Ethereum contracts can be directly migrated, with minimal learning curve for developers.
**The architecture is tailored for agents**—the payment pathways and information flow are designed to be compact, specifically for high-frequency interactions, avoiding the redundancy and latency typical of conventional blockchains.
**Agent Passport is very interesting**—each AI agent can obtain a cryptographic ID card, allowing independent management of funds and accumulation of credit, which is traceable and verifiable on-chain.
Overall, it feels like Kite isn't just hyping the AI concept but is genuinely laying the groundwork for the next generation of applications. This pragmatic approach is worth paying continued attention to.