Investors in 2025 are holding a hammer—fear reminiscent of the 2000 tech bubble. The question is, they are looking for nails everywhere, but have they really found any?
This actually stems from a psychological phenomenon. In 1966, psychologist Abraham Maslow said, "If all you have is a hammer, everything looks like a nail." Academically known as the "Maslow's Hammer"—people tend to interpret everything with familiar tools, even when they are not applicable.
Currently, the situation is the opposite. The investment community's memory of the tech bubble is so deep that some start to see everything as a replay of 2000. But is that really the case?
Look at the data. After ChatGPT became popular, the forward P/E ratio of a leading chip stock actually dropped by 15 points. Meanwhile, its stock price increased tenfold. In other words— all the gains came from genuine improvements in fundamentals, with real increases in earnings per share. This is not retail traders following hype; it’s a substantial enhancement in the company's profitability.
Here's an even more interesting detail. On a certain social investment platform, the market sentiment indicator for this stock shows "bearish." The sentiment score is based on the bullish and bearish ratio of user comments over the past 24 hours. A stock that has increased tenfold in three years is still generally being bearish by investors. Doesn't this precisely indicate that the market is not overly enthusiastic?
So, sometimes, putting down that hammer and looking directly at the data reveals that panic and frenzy are often twin brothers. The key is not to be hijacked by cognitive biases.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
10 Likes
Reward
10
10
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
SchrodingerGas
· 2025-12-28 03:29
Price multiples decline while stock prices rise tenfold? This data is a bit outrageous; we need to check if it's selective statistics.
People really love to find echoes of the past; self-verification helps them sleep better.
Looking at the actual interaction data of those "bubble" projects on-chain is much more reliable than social media sentiment indicators.
This set of cognitive bias theories is even more hilarious when applied to crypto; most people haven't even read the white paper and are just following the trend to criticize.
The problem is, after removing the hammer, most people are left without tools.
View OriginalReply0
SerRugResistant
· 2025-12-27 07:15
Data speaks for itself; it's more genuine than worrying about the bubble itself.
View OriginalReply0
rugdoc.eth
· 2025-12-26 21:56
The data is right in front of you; it's much more effective than psychological suggestion.
View OriginalReply0
LiquidatedTwice
· 2025-12-25 18:07
Lies disappear in the face of data; the problem is that most people don't look at the data at all.
View OriginalReply0
CascadingDipBuyer
· 2025-12-25 04:55
Come on, what can a bunch of data really prove... In my opinion, those who truly make money never shout about it on social platforms.
Honestly, it's just another round of shakeouts this year.
This logic is full of holes—stock prices tenfold after the P/E ratio drops? Aren't you afraid of getting trapped at high levels, everyone?
View OriginalReply0
degenonymous
· 2025-12-25 04:55
Oh my, it's the same old story again. Always hoping to find that 2000s déjà vu feeling—so reassuring, right?
Honestly, the real story is when the price rises tenfold despite the P/E ratio declining—that's the true story, not just the beginning of one.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-6bc33122
· 2025-12-25 04:51
Data hits back faster than anything, a PE decline with stock prices rising tenfold is just outrageous.
View OriginalReply0
WhaleInTraining
· 2025-12-25 04:40
Data speaks, emotions deceive. If you're still caught up in the bubble theory, wake up.
View OriginalReply0
LazyDevMiner
· 2025-12-25 04:39
Haha, it's the story of a hammer again.
Constantly shouting about bubbles, but the data is actually speaking, now that's called irony.
Price-to-earnings ratio declines while stock prices increase tenfold? Isn't that a true growth in earning capacity? Why do some people still pretend not to see it?
Investment platforms are all bearish on stocks that will rise tenfold, such timidness... really embarrassing the market sentiment index.
Instead of worrying every day about a repeat of 2000, it's better to take a good look at what the PE data is saying.
Cognitive bias is a trap; those who jump in always think everyone outside is crazy.
View OriginalReply0
DegenApeSurfer
· 2025-12-25 04:30
The data is right here: PE declines, stock prices rise tenfold, this is the real growth of solid gains.
---
Basically, it's still using the 2000s perspective to view the present. Wake up, everyone.
---
Market sentiment shows bearishness. Stocks up tenfold? I laugh. That's what you call unaware retail investors.
---
Maslow's hammer is well said, but the key is to distinguish which are truly rising and which are just air. That's the real work.
---
Analyzing data can really cure anxiety, otherwise every day is just needless worry.
---
A stock rises tenfold, yet investors still sing the blues. Isn't that a bottom consensus? Smart money already moved in this morning.
---
I get this logic, but the problem is most people simply can't understand the data; they are just being driven by emotions.
---
Bubble phobia is truly a common disease in the investment circle—fearing missing out and fearing being trapped at the same time.
---
So now it's a contrarian indicator? When it looks bearish, it should look bullish? Come on, this psychological game never ends.
Investors in 2025 are holding a hammer—fear reminiscent of the 2000 tech bubble. The question is, they are looking for nails everywhere, but have they really found any?
This actually stems from a psychological phenomenon. In 1966, psychologist Abraham Maslow said, "If all you have is a hammer, everything looks like a nail." Academically known as the "Maslow's Hammer"—people tend to interpret everything with familiar tools, even when they are not applicable.
Currently, the situation is the opposite. The investment community's memory of the tech bubble is so deep that some start to see everything as a replay of 2000. But is that really the case?
Look at the data. After ChatGPT became popular, the forward P/E ratio of a leading chip stock actually dropped by 15 points. Meanwhile, its stock price increased tenfold. In other words— all the gains came from genuine improvements in fundamentals, with real increases in earnings per share. This is not retail traders following hype; it’s a substantial enhancement in the company's profitability.
Here's an even more interesting detail. On a certain social investment platform, the market sentiment indicator for this stock shows "bearish." The sentiment score is based on the bullish and bearish ratio of user comments over the past 24 hours. A stock that has increased tenfold in three years is still generally being bearish by investors. Doesn't this precisely indicate that the market is not overly enthusiastic?
So, sometimes, putting down that hammer and looking directly at the data reveals that panic and frenzy are often twin brothers. The key is not to be hijacked by cognitive biases.