2025-12-25 04:28:59

The core logic of the market is simple — chips must flow into the hands of those who are truly willing to hold long-term. Instead of obsessing over price fluctuations, it's better to see who can hold firmly.

The design logic of FIST and OSK is actually quite interesting. The destruction mechanism directly corresponds to the volatility — the more the market fluctuates, the more aggressive the destruction, which filters out the holders' mentality. After this round of filtering, the remaining consensus believers naturally have higher quality.

Many people only look at the surface-level token quantity or bubbles, but the differences are actually in the details. Just like perfume is 99% water, the expensive part is that 1% ingredient. The same applies in the crypto world — the key is not how lively the project itself looks, but what kind of people it attracts.

Volatility filters out true believers, destruction eliminates speculators, and the remaining consensus holders naturally hold higher-quality tokens. So instead of watching the charts every day, ask yourself: Are you a true consensus believer, or just waiting for the next bag-holder?

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

24 Likes

Reward
24
10
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

SingleForYears

· 2025-12-28 03:49

To be honest, when I see the destruction mechanism and this set of logic, I think many people have misunderstood it. Large fluctuations are actually a good thing, as they can weed out the real bagholders and save trouble later on. Really, instead of researching FIST and OSK, it's better to ask yourself if you can endure a few limit-down days. Most people say long-term holding, but it's actually self-deception. The perfume analogy sounds good, but the 1% component in the crypto world is often just a story. It's better to see who can hold on rather than who can hold up.

View OriginalReply0

4am_degen

· 2025-12-27 20:26

True hodlers have long since thrown away their phones; those who watch the charts every day are just here to buy the dip. The destruction mechanism is indeed ruthless, shaking out the paper hands wave after wave, leaving only the true believers. It's nicely called consensus filtering; unkindly, it's self-elimination of the retail investors. Those who survive truly hold different coins. I like this logic, but I don't know if I'm truly in consensus or just the next sucker to buy the dip. It's really just two words—waiting to die—either waiting for a breakout or waiting to go to zero.

View OriginalReply0

wagmi_eventually

· 2025-12-27 00:01

Honestly, this burn mechanism is really harsh, cutting off both the retail investors and the true believers at once.

View OriginalReply0

AirdropChaser

· 2025-12-25 23:37

The logic is simple but not superficial: true believers have long given up, and those still watching the market are mostly waiting to catch the falling knife. The destruction mechanism is indeed ruthless; the greater the volatility, the more die. Those who remain are true believers. To put it simply, the chips are shifting from the hands of the leek farmers to the diamond hands. The process is a bit brutal but very real.

View OriginalReply0

MevWhisperer

· 2025-12-25 04:59

That's right, the filtering mechanism is indeed ruthless. Those who can hold on have a completely different mindset. The more aggressive the destruction, the more it reveals people's true intentions. After this wave, only the hardcore will remain. Most people can't tell the difference at all and are still tangled up in superficial things. Making coins is like做人, it all depends on who your surroundings are. When asking yourself this question, the answer has actually been in your heart all along. Those who watch the market every day can basically guess the outcome. With wave after wave of dumping, the true believers are the ones who live the most comfortably.

View OriginalReply0

WalletManager

· 2025-12-25 04:58

The destruction mechanism truly filters out the weak; speculators simply can't withstand the volatility. Those who hold tightly to their chips are the real winners, this is the on-chain logic. The difference between genuine consensus participants and bagholders is in the cold wallet. People who watch the market every day are all of the leek mentality; I have already switched to multi-signature wallets.

View OriginalReply0

DegenWhisperer

· 2025-12-25 04:57

That's right, the screening mechanism is the key, and after a wave of volatility, the trash automatically gets eliminated. I'm done, it's another story of self-redemption. True retail investors will never ask this question. The destruction mechanism is indeed ruthless, but the problem is most people can't hold on until that moment; their mentality has long been shattered. This logic sounds nice, but thinking about it the other way, isn't it just about screening who has the best money to cut? Do the coins held by consensus believers have higher quality? Or is it that those who survive are the ones who have no more money to continue cutting? It's basically brainwashing long-term holders. Human nature—when volatility hits, everyone forgets everything. There's some truth to it, but the last question really hits hard.

View OriginalReply0

MerkleTreeHugger

· 2025-12-25 04:48

There's nothing wrong with that; the filtering mechanism is indeed an invisible hand. Those who firmly hold on are not afraid of fluctuations; instead, every dip is an opportunity to buy. The quality of consensus is a hundred times more important than quantity, this is truly real. Not all burnings are the same; the good mechanism is the one that can drive speculators away. Nine out of ten people staring at the charts every day are waiting to receive the transfer, this is the reality.

View OriginalReply0

LightningSentry

· 2025-12-25 04:46

That's right, the move to filter out speculators is indeed ruthless. The destruction mechanism has eliminated those with unstable mindsets. Really, only a few can hold on, most are just waiting to catch the bag. FIST's recent design is quite clever; the more volatile it gets, the faster it destroys, and those who survive are true believers. Ask yourself this question and you'll understand: are you here for faith or to make quick money? Ultimately, the chips will still flow into the hands of the patient. These fluctuations are actually a big cleanup.

View OriginalReply0

GasFeeCrying