2026-01-02 11:27:11

Perpetual Contract Anti-Witch Shielding Guide

Here's a common pitfall that many people overlook: even if you are engaging in real trading on perpetual contracts, you can still be flagged as a witch account.

Recently, there was a user with a trading volume of several hundred million on a normal contract, who was directly labeled as a witch just because they used a fast VPN that caused their IP to be recognized as abnormal. Later, there was no way to appeal.

We won't speculate on the real reasons. What you can do is minimize the risk— the most effective method is to deploy your own VPN solution. This not only helps avoid IP risks but also makes your trading behavior appear more "normal." In short: don't let the exchange's risk control system catch you.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

13 Likes

Reward
13
9
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

GasFeeLady

· 01-04 22:32

yo ip flagging is wild fr... seen people get nuked with legit billions in volume just for switching vpns lmao. risk management irl

Reply0

BlockBargainHunter

· 01-03 01:57

Wow, this trap is too clever. Just like that, billions in trading volume disappeared?

View OriginalReply0

consensus_failure

· 01-02 11:56

Damn, a few hundred million in trading volume gets frozen just like that. This risk control system is really outrageous. Isn't this playing with fire? Trying to be anonymous with a VPN? Exchanges have been prepared for this long ago. Deploying your own system? Sounds simple, but actually operating it is another story. Once the "Witch" label is slapped on, it's game over; there's no appeal. So the key is not to let the risk control system catch you. That’s not wrong to say. Now, trading contracts really requires caution; even normal transactions can't escape detection. This is why you need to use a stable network solution—don't be reckless. The waters of contract trading are deeper than I thought. It feels like exchanges and users are just playing a cat-and-mouse game now.

View OriginalReply0

ContractCollector

· 01-02 11:55

Wow, a trading volume of several hundred million and still being labeled as a witch? How ridiculous is this risk control system?

View OriginalReply0

SolidityNewbie

· 01-02 11:55

The exchange's risk control system is outrageous; normal users with hundreds of millions can also be wrongly penalized.

View OriginalReply0

OfflineValidator

· 01-02 11:52

Damn, this is outrageous. Real transactions can be blocked? So using a VPN before might have been risky too.

View OriginalReply0

BridgeNomad

· 01-02 11:50

lmao the irony here... you do *actual* trading and still get nuked for ip anomalies? that's basically saying the risk model itself is the attack vector. seen this exact postmortem before with wormhole, except with accounts instead of tvl.

Reply0

LiquidityWizard

· 01-02 11:44

Billions in trading volume were just wasted on VPN issues; this risk control logic is truly exceptional.

View OriginalReply0

AirdropHunter9000

· 01-02 11:36

Oh no, this is the real trap. Millions of dollars in trading volume can be sniped in seconds. I need to be more cautious.

View OriginalReply0