2026-01-05 01:28:35

From 27,000 to 280,000, a 10x return.

It took quite some time to complete the layout.

What I’ve been emphasizing is — turning on trading alerts is crucial. It’s really important. ✅

Credit for this bottom-fishing prediction goes to my quantitative team; they captured the early signals. I then confirmed several details with them before feeling confident to intervene.

I recommend everyone hold their positions and not let go.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

21 Likes

Reward
21
9
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

RetiredMiner

· 17h ago

Is a 10x return real? Is the quantitative team also hyping it up?

View OriginalReply0

Blockchainiac

· 01-07 16:57

The quant team is reliable, and this wave is indeed stable. Just worried about not being able to hold onto the gains once they are in hand.

View OriginalReply0

blocksnark

· 01-07 14:01

A 10x return sounds pretty awesome, but the quantitative team must be really top-notch to achieve that.

View OriginalReply0

SmartMoneyWallet

· 01-07 10:48

Quant teams capturing signals? Honestly, it's still the whales manipulating the market; retail investors are just following the trend. --- 10x returns are easy to talk about, but on-chain data has long shown the flow of funds; you are only catching up now. --- With such clear chip distribution, why still boast about quant? The true trading techniques have already been exposed. --- Enable alerts? That's lame. The real way to make money is by observing the rhythm of capital battles, not relying on alerts. --- Bottom-fishing predictions? Ha, the flow of funds is the real answer. Quant teams are just chanting spells. --- 28,000 came from 2,700, I want to know how many retail investors you chopped before getting this number. --- Holding positions tightly without letting go is the most dangerous advice. When technical indicators turn, what are you still holding onto?

View OriginalReply0

mev_me_maybe

· 01-05 01:57

A 10x comeback is indeed fierce, but are quantitative teams really that reliable?

View OriginalReply0

GasOptimizer

· 01-05 01:50

10x? The data looks good, but what about the cost structure? How much of the Gas fees are eaten up is not mentioned. --- Quantitative teams capture early signals... If you say it out loud, it wouldn't really be alpha anymore, right? --- The key is capital efficiency—how much leverage can 27,000 trigger? --- The reminder function can indeed save time, but is there really that much arbitrage space with frequent trading? --- Historical backtesting looks good, but only real trading can prove it. --- Holding onto the position is a bit of a vague suggestion; what's the logic for taking profits? --- Quantitative teams confirm the details... Sounds like optimizing the fee rate model process. --- In a 10x return, how much is due to volatility gains, and how much is stable hedging gains?

View OriginalReply0

AirdropHarvester

· 01-05 01:44

10x? Damn, how strong of a hand do you need to hold that?

View OriginalReply0

TokenomicsDetective

· 01-05 01:38

Relying on the quant team to make a living, this wave was indeed accurately captured. However, holding onto the position is easy to say, but the psychological barrier is the real challenge.

View OriginalReply0

TestnetNomad

· 01-05 01:31

10x... We really caught this wave, the signals from the quant team are indeed reliable.

View OriginalReply0