【Blockchain Rhythms】The rapid development of prediction markets has attracted a large number of participants, but the associated risks cannot be ignored. Industry veterans have recently publicly expressed strong disapproval of insider trading behaviors in prediction markets.
This industry voice highlights a key issue: if insider trading is gradually accepted in prediction markets, it is very likely to be redefined as a certain “feature” rather than a flaw. Such a shift would be extremely dangerous.
Specifically, on platforms like Polymarket and Kalshi, once someone trades based on non-public information, this behavior already constitutes insider trading. Interestingly, even if a person merely detects a hint of non-public information, they should resolutely avoid related markets.
From a legal perspective, while insider traders may narrowly escape punishment, they could also face legal difficulties. Some have already faced serious consequences for insider trading in prediction markets. Taking such risks is simply not worth it.
More importantly, there are moral considerations. Knowing that the chances of making a profit are guaranteed and still engaging in such speculation is essentially a moral decline—exploiting ordinary participants who lack informational advantages. Such trading methods are unacceptable from any perspective. The long-term healthy development of prediction markets requires participants to uphold compliance awareness and ethical bottom lines together.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
9 Likes
Reward
9
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
fren.eth
· 01-06 08:36
Damn, insider trading can really ruin the entire market
The prediction market is about to be regulated again, gotta follow the rules
Really? Aren't these big players all involved in insider trading?
Compliance, compliance. Easier to say than to do
If this becomes a trend, it's over. Let's quickly establish some rules
View OriginalReply0
DataChief
· 01-06 04:49
Coming with this again? The compliance awareness routine has long been tired of hearing, and the key is that no one really checks.
View OriginalReply0
OnchainSniper
· 01-06 04:45
Insider trading, to put it simply, is the root of market destruction.
Once it becomes a trend, there's no hope. We must uphold the bottom line.
This warning came quite timely, but when it comes to actual enforcement? Uh...
View OriginalReply0
RugDocDetective
· 01-06 04:41
Insider trading, once it starts, is hard to stop, and it's just as annoying as a rug pull.
View OriginalReply0
MerkleTreeHugger
· 01-06 04:29
Prediction markets will only be popular if information symmetry is maintained. Once insider trading becomes prevalent, it's over.
---
Brothers, don't talk to me about compliance awareness; it's already an invisible form of trading.
---
This thing is really hard to prevent, unless the transparency on the chain is fundamentally improved.
---
The insider trading problem is an eternal bug; no matter how good the rules are, they are useless.
---
The key is how not to get caught... uh, no, how to truly stop it.
---
If prediction markets descend into rampant black market activity, that would be really messed up.
---
The term "moral bottom line" seems to have little meaning in the crypto world.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-6bc33122
· 01-06 04:26
Insider trading has long been an issue that needs regulation; otherwise, the prediction market will be completely ruined.
Forecast Market Insider Trading Risk Warning: Ethical Bottom Line and Legal Risks Coexist
【Blockchain Rhythms】The rapid development of prediction markets has attracted a large number of participants, but the associated risks cannot be ignored. Industry veterans have recently publicly expressed strong disapproval of insider trading behaviors in prediction markets.
This industry voice highlights a key issue: if insider trading is gradually accepted in prediction markets, it is very likely to be redefined as a certain “feature” rather than a flaw. Such a shift would be extremely dangerous.
Specifically, on platforms like Polymarket and Kalshi, once someone trades based on non-public information, this behavior already constitutes insider trading. Interestingly, even if a person merely detects a hint of non-public information, they should resolutely avoid related markets.
From a legal perspective, while insider traders may narrowly escape punishment, they could also face legal difficulties. Some have already faced serious consequences for insider trading in prediction markets. Taking such risks is simply not worth it.
More importantly, there are moral considerations. Knowing that the chances of making a profit are guaranteed and still engaging in such speculation is essentially a moral decline—exploiting ordinary participants who lack informational advantages. Such trading methods are unacceptable from any perspective. The long-term healthy development of prediction markets requires participants to uphold compliance awareness and ethical bottom lines together.