Cryptocurrency is still in its infancy—we're basically at the late 1990s stage of internet adoption. The comparison is apt: massive room for growth ahead.
Think about which infrastructure actually scales for real-world usage. Centralized proof-of-stake systems and sluggish proof-of-work blockchains might dominate today's rankings, but positioning all your conviction there could be leaving significant opportunities on the table.
The next decade will likely separate those who recognized the shift toward truly scalable, decentralized consensus mechanisms from those who didn't. Speed matters. Decentralization matters. If you're betting the farm on yesterday's infrastructure, you might miss what's actually driving the next wave of adoption.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
28 Likes
Reward
28
10
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
AltcoinTherapist
· 01-10 03:29
ngl, you're right. People who are all-in on mainstream coins really need to wake up now.
View OriginalReply0
RugpullSurvivor
· 01-10 01:49
Haha, it's that same "Internet in the 90s" rhetoric again... But to be honest, these old-timers like PoW really should step aside.
View OriginalReply0
MEVSupportGroup
· 01-09 23:02
Ha, it's the same old story... I'm already tired of hearing it.
Yesterday's infrastructure is still bleeding today, it's really funny.
View OriginalReply0
BTCBeliefStation
· 01-07 03:59
The internet analogy from the 90s has been overused, but it's really not wrong... The PoS system is popular now, but who can guarantee it will still be good in five years?
View OriginalReply0
pvt_key_collector
· 01-07 03:55
It's not even been 95 years since the internet's inception, and the things you're all in on now might just be the Nokia of that era.
View OriginalReply0
Tokenomics911
· 01-07 03:53
Well said, but there are still many people all-in on those old, crappy chains.
View OriginalReply0
PrivateKeyParanoia
· 01-07 03:44
It sounds like they're saying not to bet on outdated chains, but honestly, who isn't betting on TPS and decentralization now... It's just that most people haven't thought it through.
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeLady
· 01-07 03:42
ngl everyone sleeping on optimized consensus layers while watching mev-bloat charts... late 90s internet vibes lowkey hitting different when gas prices spike like dial-up era
Reply0
StakeTillRetire
· 01-07 03:36
ngl I'm tired of hearing about the internet in the 90s... but indeed, the PoW system is becoming increasingly unsustainable.
View OriginalReply0
GasGrillMaster
· 01-07 03:34
Honestly, now all-in on Bitcoin and Ethereum people are bound to get beaten up sooner or later.
Cryptocurrency is still in its infancy—we're basically at the late 1990s stage of internet adoption. The comparison is apt: massive room for growth ahead.
Think about which infrastructure actually scales for real-world usage. Centralized proof-of-stake systems and sluggish proof-of-work blockchains might dominate today's rankings, but positioning all your conviction there could be leaving significant opportunities on the table.
The next decade will likely separate those who recognized the shift toward truly scalable, decentralized consensus mechanisms from those who didn't. Speed matters. Decentralization matters. If you're betting the farm on yesterday's infrastructure, you might miss what's actually driving the next wave of adoption.