Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
TradFi
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Launchpad
Be early to the next big token project
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
New York seeks ways to regulate forecast contracts: a new bill proposes restrictions on political and sports betting
New York State lawmakers have introduced a bill to regulate the prediction market. According to PANews on January 9, the bill titled “ORACLE Law” was filed in November 2025 with the aim of establishing a comprehensive regulatory framework for contracts dependent on the occurrence of specific events.
Key Provisions of the Bill
The proposal suggests amendments to the General Commercial Law of the state by adding a new section numbered 48, dedicated to prediction markets. A key feature of this document is the establishment of clear restrictions on trading activities related to contracts tied to political elections and sports outcomes.
Regulatory Structure and Protective Mechanisms
The bill proposes the implementation of a detailed set of rules, including age thresholds for market participants, entry criteria for platforms, and restrictions on marketing activities. Additionally, the document contains anti-manipulation provisions aimed at preventing unfair trading practices.
Balancing Restrictions and Innovation
Interestingly, although the bill bans trading contracts linked to political and sports results, it allows for the trading of so-called neutral outcome types. Examples include general predictions such as “win or lose in the league,” which may remain accessible to participants. This approach demonstrates the regulators’ attempt to strike a balance between risk control and fostering the development of innovative financial instruments in the market.