2026-01-23 08:29:38

Recently, the operational rhythm of a certain project's official Twitter has been quite interesting. It is said that since last night, the official account has been regularly hosting Spaces every evening at 8 PM, but the origin of this is a bit funny—it’s entirely driven by the community, not something the official team planned themselves.

What exactly happened? Yesterday, some community members joined the Space to chat and interact. The official team originally had no such plans; instead, the community kept pushing for it, and only then did the official team follow suit. Honestly, looking at the current situation, it feels like the project is gradually being taken over by the community. The official attitude towards tweet updates has become somewhat lazy, and 😂 can also be a good indicator of this.

Even more amusing is that starting today, the project's Telegram group has also been directly taken over by the community. With this move, the community truly takes the lead, while the official team has become more of a supporting role. This bottom-up, community-driven model is quite rare to see in Web3 projects.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

18 Likes

Reward
18
8
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

PessimisticLayer

· 01-26 06:52

Community self-rescue projects are quite interesting. Is the official really taking a backseat or truly decentralizing authority? Hard to tell. --- This move seems somewhat risky, is the community taking over Telegram? It depends on who is steering the ship. --- Thinking in reverse, proactive community engagement isn't necessarily a good thing; beware of malicious actors sneaking in to cause trouble. --- I can understand the official's lazy attitude on social media, but is the community's full takeover really reliable? Who will bear the risks? --- Is this the legendary DAO, or just a simple abandonment? It's hard to tell. --- The regular Space at 8 PM shows that the community is indeed active, but can it sustain this long-term? --- A bottom-up approach in Web3 is indeed rare, but it usually doesn't lead to good results; history tends to repeat itself.

View OriginalReply0

FlashLoanLarry

· 01-25 04:31

The community has taken over and started playing on their own, is the official completely lying flat? What kind of project governance is this? --- Honestly, the official team really should reflect. They even have their own Telegram taken over by the community. --- Now the community DAO is in place, and the official team is completely hidden. --- Wait, isn't community takeover of Telegram a good thing? At least it’s less bureaucratic. --- Why does it feel like the official team is slacking off while the community is getting serious? --- Waiting for this model to explode, new and exciting gameplay. --- Community-driven sounds novel, but the official team being completely absent is just ridiculous. --- Is this reverse DAO or the project committing suicide? --- The official team isn’t taking action, the community is stepping up, there’s something there.

View OriginalReply0

PseudoIntellectual

· 01-23 08:59

The community has revitalized itself, and the official side is just going along with it haha

View OriginalReply0

LayerHopper

· 01-23 08:57

Community self-rescue vibe, official slacking off, official wins

View OriginalReply0

ForkItAll

· 01-23 08:56

The feeling of community self-operation... This kind of reverse driving is really rare. The official attitude is indeed a bit lazy, they've been pushed back by the community. Wait, has Telegram also taken over? Is this true autonomy or just the official shirking responsibility? Let's see who cares more about running the project now. By the way, how long can the community last? Without official resources, it might be quite difficult. Forget it, since it's all community-driven, it might be more reliable than the official, haha.

View OriginalReply0

CryptoFortuneTeller

· 01-23 08:50

The community has taken the lead, which is quite something. The official's slack-off attitude is truly remarkable.

View OriginalReply0

DaoGovernanceOfficer

· 01-23 08:48

ngl this is just decentralization theater without actual token voting mechanisms. where's the governance framework here?

Reply0

ProposalDetective

· 01-23 08:32

The community is taking charge, while the official side is just slacking off. This approach is quite fresh; usually, it's the other way around.