Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
TradFi
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Launchpad
Be early to the next big token project
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
Jeremy Barnum of JPMorgan warns about fake stable yields: ghost banks in blockchain costumes
JPMorgan’s Chief Financial Officer, Jeremy Barnum, has issued a direct warning against a new generation of stablecoin protocols promising attractive yields. These platforms — like Usual, ENA, and Unitas — adopt the same mechanisms as traditional banks but without adhering to their prudential constraints. Jeremy Barnum clearly describes this model as a “ghost bank disguised as a blockchain,” a dangerous paradox for sector stability.
Platforms that replicate the banking model without its safeguards
These high-yield stablecoins promise regular interest on deposits, enticing users with the promise of simple and attractive gains. However, unlike traditional banks, which have built their models over centuries of prudential regulation, these protocols deliberately circumvent essential standards. They operate in a regulatory gray area, exploiting the lack of a clearly defined legal framework for decentralized finance.
The critical absence of protection mechanisms
Jeremy Barnum emphasizes that these platforms lack two fundamental pillars: first, no capital adequacy ratio is required, unlike regulated banking institutions; second, no deposit guarantee protects users in case of a crisis. This double absence turns each user into an uninsured creditor, exposed to total loss if the platform collapses.
A building systemic instability
The real risk, according to Jeremy Barnum, lies in the gradual accumulation of these unsecured positions. If these protocols continue to attract massive capital, a cascading contagion could destabilize the entire crypto ecosystem. Financial authorities are now monitoring these innovations with justified suspicion, recognizing in these “ghost banks” a replay of the mistakes that preceded major financial crises in the past.