Recently, the stock market has hit record highs, but several technical indicators are sending mixed signals. When the S&P 500 first broke through the 7,000-point threshold, a thought-provoking phenomenon emerged—the most sensitive warning signals in the market are flashing.
This contradiction between superficial prosperity and hidden risks is raising alertness among professional investors. The steady climb of stock indices seems to be at odds with the true underlying fundamentals.
Contradictory Signals Behind the New Highs in Stock Indices
The breakthrough of the S&P 500 past 7,000 points is indeed a historic milestone worth noting. However, a closer look at weekly and daily charts reveals an unsettling trend—bear market divergence is gradually forming. The movements of Nasdaq and Dow Jones are similarly concerning; although they are nominally high, their underlying momentum is weakening.
Auxiliary technical analysis indicators (including momentum metrics, volume analysis, and multi-dimensional assessment tools) are already hinting at a market losing its strength. The convergence of these signals paints a worrying picture—the market is masking declining internal strength with rising prices.
False Prosperity Driven by Dollar Depreciation
What truly warrants attention is that gold (PAXG) is also reaching new highs. These two assets, which typically move inversely, are advancing together, defying basic market logic. The only explanation behind this is the ongoing depreciation of the US dollar.
When the dollar weakens, all dollar-pegged assets theoretically appreciate accordingly—this explains why stocks and gold can rise simultaneously. This synchronicity itself is a systemic risk signal. The Federal Reserve’s decision to keep interest rates unchanged, in this context, appears particularly perplexing.
Historical Warnings and Present Risks
The market crash during the 2008 mortgage crisis bears a striking resemblance to the current scenario—prices are artificially maintained at high levels, liquidity is repeatedly injected, yet fundamentals continue to deteriorate. That crisis inflicted deep wounds on the global economy, and history often repeats itself in more severe forms.
The longer the market is supported by various policies “lifting” it, the greater the potential decline. A 30-60% correction might be a conservative estimate. As investor Michael Burry has said, while market crashes can be predicted, “the trend will turn before your funds are exhausted”—a reminder that accurate judgment and patience are indispensable.
The Dilemma of Crypto Asset Correlation
Bitcoin’s latest movements further confirm this point. When BTC declines in tandem with the dollar, it prompts deeper reflection on the true valuation of crypto assets. (Data as of February 5, 2026: BTC at $71,450, down 7.27% in 24 hours) Is crypto truly establishing an independent value foundation, or is it merely an extension of dollar substitutes? This question is becoming increasingly urgent.
The trajectories of gold, stocks, and crypto assets are all influenced by the dollar’s depreciation. When this correlation determines the direction of all assets, the market’s ability to price assets accurately comes into question.
The Dilemma of Protecting Risk Assets
In such a market environment, investors face a dilemma. Precious metals are traditional hedging tools, but during a real crisis, gold and other assets often sell off simultaneously—at which point, gold prices may be high, but liquidity is at its worst.
There is no certainty about when the market will crash; it could be tomorrow or years from now. But what is certain is that this imbalance cannot last forever. Multi-layered technical divergences, systemic dollar depreciation, and increasingly intangible asset valuations have combined into a complex and dangerous situation.
In this period of uncertainty, deep market observation and cautious attitude are more valuable than any aggressive prediction.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
System Imbalance Under New Stock Market Highs: Multiple Signals Reveal Hidden Risks
Recently, the stock market has hit record highs, but several technical indicators are sending mixed signals. When the S&P 500 first broke through the 7,000-point threshold, a thought-provoking phenomenon emerged—the most sensitive warning signals in the market are flashing.
This contradiction between superficial prosperity and hidden risks is raising alertness among professional investors. The steady climb of stock indices seems to be at odds with the true underlying fundamentals.
Contradictory Signals Behind the New Highs in Stock Indices
The breakthrough of the S&P 500 past 7,000 points is indeed a historic milestone worth noting. However, a closer look at weekly and daily charts reveals an unsettling trend—bear market divergence is gradually forming. The movements of Nasdaq and Dow Jones are similarly concerning; although they are nominally high, their underlying momentum is weakening.
Auxiliary technical analysis indicators (including momentum metrics, volume analysis, and multi-dimensional assessment tools) are already hinting at a market losing its strength. The convergence of these signals paints a worrying picture—the market is masking declining internal strength with rising prices.
False Prosperity Driven by Dollar Depreciation
What truly warrants attention is that gold (PAXG) is also reaching new highs. These two assets, which typically move inversely, are advancing together, defying basic market logic. The only explanation behind this is the ongoing depreciation of the US dollar.
When the dollar weakens, all dollar-pegged assets theoretically appreciate accordingly—this explains why stocks and gold can rise simultaneously. This synchronicity itself is a systemic risk signal. The Federal Reserve’s decision to keep interest rates unchanged, in this context, appears particularly perplexing.
Historical Warnings and Present Risks
The market crash during the 2008 mortgage crisis bears a striking resemblance to the current scenario—prices are artificially maintained at high levels, liquidity is repeatedly injected, yet fundamentals continue to deteriorate. That crisis inflicted deep wounds on the global economy, and history often repeats itself in more severe forms.
The longer the market is supported by various policies “lifting” it, the greater the potential decline. A 30-60% correction might be a conservative estimate. As investor Michael Burry has said, while market crashes can be predicted, “the trend will turn before your funds are exhausted”—a reminder that accurate judgment and patience are indispensable.
The Dilemma of Crypto Asset Correlation
Bitcoin’s latest movements further confirm this point. When BTC declines in tandem with the dollar, it prompts deeper reflection on the true valuation of crypto assets. (Data as of February 5, 2026: BTC at $71,450, down 7.27% in 24 hours) Is crypto truly establishing an independent value foundation, or is it merely an extension of dollar substitutes? This question is becoming increasingly urgent.
The trajectories of gold, stocks, and crypto assets are all influenced by the dollar’s depreciation. When this correlation determines the direction of all assets, the market’s ability to price assets accurately comes into question.
The Dilemma of Protecting Risk Assets
In such a market environment, investors face a dilemma. Precious metals are traditional hedging tools, but during a real crisis, gold and other assets often sell off simultaneously—at which point, gold prices may be high, but liquidity is at its worst.
There is no certainty about when the market will crash; it could be tomorrow or years from now. But what is certain is that this imbalance cannot last forever. Multi-layered technical divergences, systemic dollar depreciation, and increasingly intangible asset valuations have combined into a complex and dangerous situation.
In this period of uncertainty, deep market observation and cautious attitude are more valuable than any aggressive prediction.