Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
TradFi
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Launchpad
Be early to the next big token project
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
Recently, some people have started claiming that Bitcoin is actually controlled by a Middle Eastern country, that developers have been infiltrated, that the price is being manipulated, and that even Wall Street is just playing along. To be honest, these claims sound exciting, but they don't hold up logically. I’ve gone through these assertions and will highlight a few key points for everyone to judge for themselves. Many people still believe that control over Bitcoin lies in the hands of developers. But in reality, developers are just the ones writing the code; whether the code is used or not is decided by nodes around the world. If you disagree with an upgrade, you can simply choose not to upgrade. Historically, the community has repeatedly rejected proposals from core developers. Some also say that certain companies have hired many core developers, thus controlling Bitcoin. But that logic is like saying that if a car manufacturer hires many engineers, it can control all engineers worldwide and decide the future of global automotive development—that's obviously impossible! The true decision-makers are miners, nodes, and the market, not the people writing the code.
Now, about the claim of price manipulation. Bitcoin’s size now is enormous, with ETFs, institutional funds, and global capital involved. If someone claims a country or institution is long-term manipulating the price, short-term impacts might occur, causing some volatility, but the long-term trend is driven by market consensus, not by any single party’s direct control. Conspiracy theories share a common trait: they start with a few real fragments and then piece together a huge story. It sounds plausible, but the critical chain of evidence is missing, and it doesn’t stand up to scrutiny.
So, my conclusion is simple: the rise and fall of Bitcoin’s price fundamentally depend on capital cycles and market sentiment. Recently, Bitcoin’s sharp decline—something no one believed during the bull market—has brought out all kinds of conspiracy theories. But in a bear market, all sorts of stories emerge. If Bitcoin were truly completely controlled by any one party, it would have lost its value long ago. It’s precisely because no one can control it that it has any meaning at all.