Futures
Hundreds of contracts settled in USDT or BTC
TradFi
Gold
Trade global traditional assets with USDT in one place
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Futures Kickoff
Get prepared for your futures trading
Futures Events
Participate in events to win generous rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to experience risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Launchpad
Be early to the next big token project
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and enjoy airdrop rewards!
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
Investment
Simple Earn
Earn interests with idle tokens
Auto-Invest
Auto-invest on a regular basis
Dual Investment
Buy low and sell high to take profits from price fluctuations
Soft Staking
Earn rewards with flexible staking
Crypto Loan
0 Fees
Pledge one crypto to borrow another
Lending Center
One-stop lending hub
VIP Wealth Hub
Customized wealth management empowers your assets growth
Private Wealth Management
Customized asset management to grow your digital assets
Quant Fund
Top asset management team helps you profit without hassle
Staking
Stake cryptos to earn in PoS products
Smart Leverage
New
No forced liquidation before maturity, worry-free leveraged gains
GUSD Minting
Use USDT/USDC to mint GUSD for treasury-level yields
Vitalik proposes introducing a transaction simulation mechanism to improve the security and user experience of Ethereum
ChainCatcher reports that, according to Cointelegraph, Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin posted on X platform on Sunday, suggesting improvements to Ethereum wallet and smart contract security and user experience through mechanisms such as “transaction simulation.”
Vitalik believes that security and user experience are not mutually exclusive domains; both revolve around user intent, with the core being to ensure that protocol operations align with user expectations. His proposed “intent security” solution includes: allowing users to preview the simulation results of on-chain actions before executing, then choosing to confirm or cancel; additionally, mechanisms such as spending limits and multi-signature approval can be introduced, permitting execution only when user intent, expected outcome, and risk limits are aligned, thereby lowering the threshold for low-risk operations while increasing the difficulty of executing risky ones.
He also points out that defining user intent is inherently complex, which is the fundamental reason why perfect security solutions do not exist. It is not a flaw in machines or designers, but because user intent itself is a complex object that even users find difficult to clearly grasp. He states that the common feature of excellent security solutions is enabling users to express their intent through multiple mutually corroborating methods, with the system only executing operations when these expressions are consistent.