Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
TradFi
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Futures Kickoff
Get prepared for your futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to experience risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Launchpad
Be early to the next big token project
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
BIP-110 sparks controversy in the Bitcoin community, with several OGs like Wang Chun and Jameson Lopp explicitly opposing it.
Odaily Planet Daily reports that the BIP-110 proposal has recently sparked significant controversy within the Bitcoin community, with several Bitcoin OGs including Fish Pool co-founder Wang Chun, Casa co-founder Jameson Lopp, and Blockstream CEO Adam Back explicitly voicing their opposition.
Wang Chun stated that BIP-110 is like “a bunch of nonsense packaged in the name of protecting children, then imposed on us as a whole.”
Jameson Lopp also published a lengthy article criticizing BIP-110 as reckless, irrational, and doomed to fail.
Adam Back believes that BIP-110 could threaten Bitcoin’s immutability and store of value.
Odaily Note: BIP-110 is a recent proposed improvement in the Bitcoin community, aiming to limit the size of non-monetary data (such as Ordinals inscriptions) in transactions through a soft fork, to alleviate the issue of “junk data” occupying block space.